Chapter 26
Chapter 26
Note 1: This Bible study is
being created specifically for a friend of mine. It is not meant as an
exhaustive study of the book of Acts. Please do your own research, using the
commentary links as a starting point, for a better understanding of the book of
Acts and other books of the Bible. Thank you for your dedication to studying
the word of God!
Note 2: All Bible verse
citations are from NKJV (New King James Version) unless otherwise stated.
Note 3: # This symbol will be
used for any information from Dr.
Nunnally’s “A Commentary on the Book of Acts” (Source info below). This
Bible study is heavily based on Dr. Nunnally’s work. I have not yet discovered
if he has published his book, but I will post a link for his work if I find out
that he has published it. Feel free to comment on this blog if you discover his
published book (if it’s published) before I do!
- All notes that have this or no symbol in front of them are my
interpretations of scripture.
*NIV Zondervan study Bible
+ other source (cited within
hyperlink or in “Sources” at bottom of page)
Verse 32: King
Agrippa fully accepted Paul’s defense and agreed that he should be set free,
but because Paul had appealed to Caesar, he would not be set free. It is
difficult to tell if King Agrippa would have had the authority to free Paul
even if he had not appealed though, since
Festus had in fact only asked for his opinion on the matter. After reading
some of the commentaries on this verse, it was hard to tell how much authority
King Agrippa had, or whether he even had jurisdiction over the area in which
Paul was imprisoned. Here is the link for the commentaries I read about this
issue: Bible Hub
commentaries.
Sources
W.E. Nunnally. A Commentary on the Book of Acts, 2008, Evangel University,
2008, Springfield, Missouri, 2017.
Comments
Post a Comment